Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00746
Original file (BC 2014 00746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-00746
		
			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependents.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He would like the opportunity to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill 
to his dependents.  He was unaware of the program and the 
requirement to make the transfer while on active duty. 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to the Military Personnel Data System, the applicant 
retired from the Air Force effective 31 July 2003 in the grade 
of lieutenant colonel.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial.  The applicant retired on 31 July 
2003, prior to the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.  By 
law and Department of Defense Regulations, the program for the 
Transfer of Benefits began on 1 August 2009.  Since 38 USC 
Chapter 33, Section 3319 (f)(1) states an individual…may 
transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the 
armed forces when the transfer is executed.

The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________




APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 22 September 2014, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit C).  As of this date, this office has received 
no response.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of this case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant is not a victim of an error or injustice since he 
retired prior to the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.   
Therefore, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00746 in Executive Session on 20 February 2015, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00746 was considered:

	Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dtd 2 Feb 14.
	Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dtd 12 Mar 14.
	Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dtd 22 Sep 14. 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00168

    Original file (BC 2014 00168.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends granting the applicant’s request noting the applicant may not have received accurate information regarding transferring education benefits to his dependents. Service members of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 Aug 09, eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04900

    Original file (BC-2012-04900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04900 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial since the applicant retired prior to the effective date of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02026

    Original file (BC 2014 02026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to documentation provided by the applicant, on 5 Apr 11, she received a Certificate of Eligibility from the Department of Veterans Affairs indicating she is entitled to benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill. An applicant cannot obtain approval for a program that did not exist at the time of their separation/retirement. Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 Aug 09, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least six years of service on the date of election may...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03263

    Original file (BC 2013 03263.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The possibility exists that the applicant may not have received any information about the Post- 9/11 GI Bill and TEB program. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the applicant did not receive adequate counseling as required by law and DOD regulation, and was not personally notified about the need to transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, the Board may approve the applicant’s request. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01493

    Original file (BC 2014 01493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He retired in 2004 after serving 27 years and the option to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits was not available at the time of his retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00975

    Original file (BC 2014 00975.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00975 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits (TEB) to his dependents while he was on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02960

    Original file (BC 2014 02960.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application as the benefit was instituted in 2009 and he was not informed that such a program existed. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03183

    Original file (BC 2014 03183.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his application because he feels it is unfair that his dependents be punished for an error made by not being educated on the process of allocating one month to each dependent. Airmen who wish to retain their transfer benefit may reference Attachment 3, Enlisted Palace Chase Program, for continued service in the Guard or Reserve.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02070

    Original file (BC 2014 02070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, stating that on 28 Jun 12, the applicant submitted the Pre-Application Checklist which states by law (USC Title 38), certain enrollment actions (e.g., initiation of Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer of benefits) are only available while on active duty and lost once separated or retired. The applicant has not provided supporting evidence that an error or injustice has occurred on the part of the Air Force. There is no proof the applicant did not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03824

    Original file (BC 2014 03824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any Service member on or after 1 August 2009, who is entitled to the Post-9/11 GI Bill at the time of the approval of his or her request to transfer that entitlement, may transfer that entitlement provided he or she meets one of these conditions: * Has at least 6 years of service in the Military Services (active duty or Selected Reserve), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commissioned Officer Corps (NOAA) Corps, or Commissioned Corps of the...